4th March 2026

BESS HP0 testing delivered ahead of plan for a major grid connection.

HP0 testing is a critical hold point in the pathway to energisation and broader operational milestones. In practice, HP0 windows can expand quickly if interfaces, readiness, or stakeholder coordination aren’t managed tightly, particularly when multiple organisations must align on the schedule, approvals, test load profile and operational constraints.

For this milestone, the test window was planned as a multi-day activity, inline with similar or typical experience and expectations. Through TEC-C’s and its project partners coordinated planning and disciplined interface management, the required HP0 testing was completed in a single day, allowing subsequent planned days to be stood down saving on important project costs.

TEC-C’s role: integrated planning and stakeholder alignment

Milestones like this rely on more than good engineering; they rely on a delivery team that can act as the conductor across stakeholders.

In this case, TEC-C and its project partners proposed the test approach and coordinated the load profile and execution plan in collaboration with the BESS OEM Integrator and key stakeholders, ensuring alignment across:

  • Site execution and commissioning teams
  • AusNet operational requirements and interfaces
  • AEMO planning considerations and on-the-day permissions
  • OEM/vendor support and readiness

 

Why this outcome matters

For our clients, commissioning outcomes are not simply a technical win, they are a schedule and risk outcome. When commissioning milestones are achieved early and cleanly:

  • exposure to outages, access constraints and resourcing clashes reduces
  • downstream activities proceed with higher certainty
  • clients are better positioned to meet their own delivery commitments

 

A result built on preparation and quality

As TEC-C’s Managing Director, Davin Berelowitz, commented following the milestone:
“Sites often experience delays at commissioning and hold point testing, this shows what quality design, construction and commissioning can achieve.”

The outcome reflects the combined effort of all parties involved — and the value of treating commissioning as a managed program with clear governance, not an isolated event.